|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Primary Me
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 11:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
A voice for Hi-sec, a voice for reason.
Vote 315 |

Primary Me
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 11:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:So it can be the game I want to play
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:So it can be the game I want
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:I want
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:I want
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:I want You should stamp your foot when you throw your self-intitled tantrums
James 315 for CSM 8. A voice for hi-sec, a voice for reason. |

Primary Me
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 19:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
Manu Militari wrote:Kitsumoto said it right, James is approaching this as an extremist and what hisec needs is a moderate. An individual's ideas on the CSM will be diluted due to the CSM being a committee and the other members have contrary views. If James holds moderate views they will be diluted down until they are ineffectual, by taking a radical and extreme stance, by the time his ideas have been moderated there will still be enough left to work with.
James 315 for CSM 8. A voice for hi-sec, a voice for reason. |

Primary Me
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 20:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
Manu Militari wrote:Moderate : tending toward the mean or average Radical ideas lea to strong opposition and therefore dilution. However what you are saying is that James is falsely stating his intention. How can I take any of his positions seriously then?
As a representative of hisec one should stand up for what the average of hisec want not one extreme. So much for that idea.. I'm sure James is stating his position honestly. In politics moderates cause stagnation and extremes cause change, and hi-sec desperately needs change.
James 315 for CSM 8. A voice for hi-sec, a voice for reason. |

Primary Me
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2013.02.09 01:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
Manu Militari wrote:As the game stands now, null sec is much more rewarding than high sec, and its not working. The game needs a fix for nullsec and lowsec, not a complete nerf of hisec. If you have 2 things, one working and one not, you dont get the broken one to work by breaking the working one, thats idiotic. Due to power creep it is always better to balance by nerfing rather than boosting. Null and low both need to be boosted but this means a corresponding nerf to hi-sec otherwise null will become to OP.
CCP know this, they just really don't want to come out and say it. At least not until they have the flood defenses in place ready for the tidal flow of tears.
James 315 for CSM 8. A voice for hi-sec, a voice for reason. |

Primary Me
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 00:14:00 -
[6] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Looks like you need to get on to them paying him, his scam money, ooh I mean share money. How is it a scam?
James 315 for CSM 8. A voice for hi-sec, a voice for reason. |

Primary Me
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 09:45:00 -
[7] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Primary Me wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Looks like you need to get on to them paying him, his scam money, ooh I mean share money. How is it a scam? Ok I wont call it a scam for you I will just use the old adage "There is a sucker born every minute" So why are the shareholders 'suckers'? You really need to start backing your empty arguments up with some opinion, otherwise you're just coming across as foolish.
James 315 for CSM 8. A voice for hi-sec, a voice for reason. |

Primary Me
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 22:07:00 -
[8] - Quote
Another incisive post by James: http://themittani.com/features/highsec-rising-danger-safe-zone-eve Straight to the point as usual
James 315 for CSM 8. A voice for hi-sec, a voice for reason. |

Primary Me
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
30
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 12:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: Actually the whole war dec issue mostly comes about not from people wanting good fights but people acting like bullies. They just need to alter the formula to be about kills rather than members.
So say my corp has 50 kill total in the last 12 months and I war dec Goonswarm for example so 50 mill a week fee. If on the other hand my corp is war decd by a merc corp for example 12000 kills in the last 12 months, so the bill is 5 billion a week.
This would make pvp corps go after other pvp corps of the same kind of level or ones with more kills, without completely removing the occasional fun of wasting miners.
Yeah you want to beat up baby seals you have to pay for the privilege. Unlike the current system where if you want to attack a bigger opponent you must pay more. That was just stupidity.
Easy fixed.
Wouldn't people just keep creating new corps with zero kills before wardeccing? James 315 for CSM 8. A voice for hi-sec, a voice for reason. |

Primary Me
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
41
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 20:46:00 -
[10] - Quote
More wise words:
http://www.minerbumping.com/2013/03/a-few-controversial-opinions.html
Are any other CSM candidates this open about what they stand for? Can any of them show even a fraction of this level of honesty? James 315 for CSM 8. A voice for hi-sec, a voice for reason. |
|

Primary Me
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
45
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 19:46:00 -
[11] - Quote
Usalon Mikakka wrote:If this smelly little douche bag gets in then, then say good bye to about 500k subscribers. Citation needed.
Or is this you and all your alts?
James 315 for CSM 8. A voice for hi-sec, a voice for reason. |
|
|
|